National Institute of Ecology

10.3k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute of Ecology

943 papers receiving 10.3k citations

Peers

National Institute of Ecology
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Ecological Modeling 637
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 818
  • Ecology 1.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 856
Replace National Institute of Biological Resources with:
National Institute of Biological Resources South Korea
Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Russia
National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center
Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University Japan
National Fisheries University Japan
International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals China
Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center Japan
Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution
Taiwan Forestry Research Institute Taiwan
Korea National Arboretum
National Institute of Ecology relative to National Institute of Biological Resources South Korea National Institute of Biological Resources's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
National Institute of Biological Resources · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Ecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Ecology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Ecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Ecology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Ecology at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Ecology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Ecology have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Ecological Modeling, 120 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 221 papers in Ecology, 155 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 218 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Ecology and Conservation Studies (80 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (71 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (66 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (59 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (47 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (42 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (42 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (637 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (818 citations), Ecology (1.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (856 citations). Authors at National Institute of Ecology collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Plants, Animals, Sustainability and ZooKeys. Some of National Institute of Ecology's most productive authors include Yao-Wu Xing, Richard H. Ree, Jeong-Cheol Kim, Saro Lee, Andy S. Choi, Hyung-Sup Jung, Sunmin Lee, Stefan Gössling, Jae-hyuck Lee and C. Max Finlayson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact