National Institute of Biology

60.3k citations
2.2k papers ·

Impact in

    • Marine and coastal ecosystems
    • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Pollution top 5%
    • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
    • Heavy metals in environment

Papers in

National Institute of Biology

2.0k papers receiving 57.6k citations

Peers

National Institute of Biology
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Oceanography 7.6k
  • Pollution 6.5k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 6.9k
  • Environmental Chemistry 5.0k
  • Horticulture 467
Replace Institute for Biodiversity with:
Institute for Biodiversity Germany
Czech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre Czechia
Fondazione Edmund Mach Italy
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany Czechia
Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria Italy
Institute of Botany of the Slovak Academy of Sciences Slovakia
Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures Germany
Institute of Plant Biology Hungary
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany Czechia
Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire France
National Institute of Biology relative to Institute for Biodiversity Germany Institute for Biodiversity's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Institute for Biodiversity · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Biology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Biology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Biology at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Biology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Biology have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 60.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 381 papers in Oceanography, 29 papers in Horticulture, 142 papers in Paleontology, 190 papers in Environmental Chemistry and 427 papers in Ecology on the topics of Marine and coastal ecosystems (171 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (159 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (156 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (118 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (104 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (98 papers), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (82 papers) and Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (78 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (7.6k citations), Pollution (6.5k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (6.9k citations), Environmental Chemistry (5.0k citations) and Horticulture (467 citations). Authors at National Institute of Biology collaborate with scholars in Slovenia, Italy and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Hydrobiologia and Scientific Reports. Some of National Institute of Biology's most productive authors include Metka Filipič, Tamara T. Lah, Bojana Žegura, Maja Ravnikar, Jadran Faganeli, Meta Virant‐Doberlet, Andrej Čokl, Kristina Gruden, Alenka Malej and Anton Brancelj.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact