National Institute of Animal Health

73.5k citations
3.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute of Animal Health

3.5k papers receiving 73.4k citations

Peers

National Institute of Animal Health
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Animal Science and Zoology 10.1k
  • Parasitology 4.9k
  • Microbiology 4.1k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 6.3k
  • Small Animals 4.8k
Replace National Agriculture and Food Research Organization with:
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization Japan
Azabu University Japan
National Institute of Health Sciences Japan
Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University Japan
National Institute of Genetics Japan
Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Japan
National Institute of Infectious Diseases Japan
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Japan
Rakuno Gakuen University Japan
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Japan
National Institute of Animal Health relative to National Agriculture and Food Research Organization Japan National Agriculture and Food Research Organization's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Animal Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Animal Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Animal Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Animal Health more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Animal Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Animal Health at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Animal Health at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Animal Health

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Animal Health have published 3.6k papers, which have received a total of 73.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 597 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 294 papers in Microbiology, 429 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 241 papers in Parasitology and 276 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Animal Virus Infections Studies (493 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (264 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (188 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (185 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (180 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (157 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (127 papers) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (122 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Animal Science and Zoology (10.1k citations), Parasitology (4.9k citations), Microbiology (4.1k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (6.3k citations) and Small Animals (4.8k citations). Authors at National Institute of Animal Health collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Archives of Virology, Veterinary Microbiology, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Journal of Veterinary Medical Science and Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. Some of National Institute of Animal Health's most productive authors include Hideo Murata, Daisuke Takamatsu, Masaji Mase, Koji Yoshioka, Tsutomu Sekizaki, Yuichi Yokomizo, Kenji Sekikawa, Yuji Inaba, Keerthi S. Guruge and Norio Katoh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact