National Health and Medical Research Council

5.1k papers receiving 204.2k citations

Peers

National Health and Medical Research Council
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 3.1k
  • Physiology 22.4k
  • Oncology 21.5k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 11.7k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 5.8k
Replace St Vincent's Hospital Sydney with:
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital Australia
Children's Hospital at Westmead Australia
Monash Health Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital Australia
The George Institute for Global Health Australia
St George Hospital Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Australia
Concord Repatriation General Hospital Australia
The Alfred Hospital Australia
National Health and Medical Research Council relative to St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia St Vincent's Hospital Sydney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Health and Medical Research Council

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Health and Medical Research Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Health and Medical Research Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Health and Medical Research Council more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Health and Medical Research Council

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Health and Medical Research Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Health and Medical Research Council at the time of their publication.

About National Health and Medical Research Council

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Health and Medical Research Council have published 6.5k papers, which have received a total of 266.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 148 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 86 papers in Occupational Therapy, 539 papers in Oncology and 470 papers in Physiology on the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (171 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (150 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (91 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (86 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (79 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (79 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (78 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (75 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geriatrics and Gerontology (3.1k citations), Physiology (22.4k citations), Oncology (21.5k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (11.7k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (5.8k citations). Authors at National Health and Medical Research Council collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Medical Journal of Australia, Immunology and Cell Biology, BMJ Open and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Some of National Health and Medical Research Council's most productive authors include Davina Ghersi, Lesley Stewart, David Moher, Mike Clarke, Mark Petticrew, Larissa Shamseer, Paul Shekelle, Anthony F. Jorm, Alessandro Liberati and Val Gebski.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact