CEA Grenoble

975.8k citations
32.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

CEA Grenoble

30.9k papers receiving 945.3k citations

Peers

CEA Grenoble
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Condensed Matter Physics 101.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 111.0k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 162.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 227.5k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 244.5k
Replace European Synchrotron Radiation Facility with:
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility France
Forschungszentrum Jülich Germany
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research Germany
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble France
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté France
Laboratoire de Chimie France
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres France
Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia Italy
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory United Kingdom
FZI Research Center for Information Technology Germany
CEA Grenoble relative to European Synchrotron Radiation Facility France European Synchrotron Radiation Facility's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at CEA Grenoble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at CEA Grenoble. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at CEA Grenoble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CEA Grenoble more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at CEA Grenoble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with CEA Grenoble at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with CEA Grenoble at the time of their publication.

About CEA Grenoble

In recent decades, authors affiliated with CEA Grenoble have published 32.4k papers, which have received a total of 975.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.0k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 3.9k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 6.4k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 11.5k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 278 papers in Structural Biology on the topics of Semiconductor materials and devices (3.4k papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (1.9k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.5k papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (1.4k papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (1.2k papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1.1k papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (1.1k papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (966 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (101.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (111.0k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (162.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (227.5k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (244.5k citations). Authors at CEA Grenoble collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters and Microelectronic Engineering. Some of CEA Grenoble's most productive authors include Jean Cadet, Marc Fontecave, Thierry Douki, Jacques Villain, Vincent Artero, Thierry Rabilloud, Bernard Dieny, Natalio Mingo, Juan Carlos Fontecilla-Camps and Jean‐Luc Ravanat.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact