Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
Impact in
- Accounting top 2%
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
Papers in
- Accounting 492
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis 443
- Demography 432
- Retirement, Disability, and Employment 241
- Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management 158
- Top scholars
- Rob AlessieArthur van SoestAnnamaria LusardiM.C.J. van RooijArvid O. I. HoffmannArno RiedlThomas PostAdriaan Kalwij
- Journals
- Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance (29 papers)Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (27 papers)Journal of Health Economics (18 papers)Health Economics (17 papers)Insurance Mathematics and Economics (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
1.1k papers receiving 20.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
- Accounting 7.7k
- General Decision Sciences 1.1k
- Demography 6.1k
- Finance 3.8k
- Economics and Econometrics 8.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement at the time of their publication.
About Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 22.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 492 papers in Accounting, 432 papers in Demography, 67 papers in General Decision Sciences, 259 papers in Finance and 588 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (443 papers), Global Health Care Issues (273 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (241 papers), Housing Market and Economics (167 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (158 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (121 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (113 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (93 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Accounting (7.7k citations), General Decision Sciences (1.1k citations), Demography (6.1k citations), Finance (3.8k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (8.8k citations). Authors at Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Health Economics, Health Economics and Insurance Mathematics and Economics. Some of Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement's most productive authors include Rob Alessie, Arthur van Soest, Annamaria Lusardi, M.C.J. van Rooij, Arvid O. I. Hoffmann, Arno Riedl, Thomas Post, Adriaan Kalwij, Michael D. Hurd and Susann Rohwedder.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.