New England Institute of Art

5.3k citations
271 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

New England Institute of Art

193 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

New England Institute of Art
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Mechanics of Materials 1.1k
  • General Psychology 43
  • Clinical Psychology 634
  • Dermatology 225
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 177
Replace Newport Hospital with:
Newport Hospital United States
Saratoga Hospital United States
Chester County Historical Society United States
Allied Services United States
Valley Regional Hospital United States
ILC Dover (United States) United States
Roxbury Community College United States
Columbus State Community College United States
Cégep de Lévis Canada
American Society For Testing and Materials United States
New England Institute of Art relative to Newport Hospital United States Newport Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
Newport Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New England Institute of Art

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New England Institute of Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New England Institute of Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New England Institute of Art more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New England Institute of Art

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New England Institute of Art at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New England Institute of Art at the time of their publication.

About New England Institute of Art

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New England Institute of Art have published 271 papers, which have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 37 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 2 papers in General Psychology, 1 paper in Chemical Health and Safety and 6 papers in Otorhinolaryngology on the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (6 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (5 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (5 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (5 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Mechanics of Materials (1.1k citations), General Psychology (43 citations), Clinical Psychology (634 citations), Dermatology (225 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (177 citations). Authors at New England Institute of Art collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Surgery, American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurology, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and The Laryngoscope. Some of New England Institute of Art's most productive authors include L. M. Kachanov, Abram Chipman, Robert M. Goldwyn, Robert M. Goisman, Sara E. Wilson, Elizabeth Myers, Kurt H. Thoma, Ana‐María Rizzuto, John T. Maltsberger and Larry Kaufman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact