National Food Chain Safety Office

12.6k citations
789 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Food Chain Safety Office

732 papers receiving 12.2k citations

Peers

National Food Chain Safety Office
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.9k
  • Parasitology 1.2k
  • Infectious Diseases 2.9k
  • Insect Science 1.6k
  • Microbiology 676
Replace Scientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad" with:
Scientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad" Serbia
National Center for Epidemiology Hungary
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata Italy
Institute for Animal Husbandry Serbia
Forschungs- und Beratungsstelle Arbeitswelt Austria
University of Kaposvár Hungary
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche Italy
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno Italy
National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Bulgaria
Witold Stefański Institute of Parasitology Poland
National Food Chain Safety Office relative to Scientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad" Serbia Scientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad"'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Scientific Veterinary Institute "Novi Sad" · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Food Chain Safety Office

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Food Chain Safety Office. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Food Chain Safety Office with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Food Chain Safety Office more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Food Chain Safety Office

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Food Chain Safety Office at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Food Chain Safety Office at the time of their publication.

About National Food Chain Safety Office

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Food Chain Safety Office have published 789 papers, which have received a total of 12.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 137 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 164 papers in Insect Science, 63 papers in Microbiology, 184 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 156 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (117 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (103 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (95 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (85 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (62 papers), Research on scale insects (61 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (59 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (55 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Animal Science and Zoology (1.9k citations), Parasitology (1.2k citations), Infectious Diseases (2.9k citations), Insect Science (1.6k citations) and Microbiology (676 citations). Authors at National Food Chain Safety Office collaborate with scholars in Hungary, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Veterinary Microbiology, Scientific Reports, Veterinary Parasitology and Animals. Some of National Food Chain Safety Office's most productive authors include Árpád Ámbrus, George Melika, T. Sréter, Ádám Dán, Z. Széll, Károly Erdélyi, Gyula Kasza, Ádám Bálint, Graham N. Stone and Levente Szeredi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact