National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 0.5%
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
-
- Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
- Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Papers in
- Biomaterials 1.3k
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery 823
-
- Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics 655
- Top scholars
- Zhong Lin WangZhiyong TangChunying ChenLei JiangZhixiang WeiYuliang ZhaoXingyu JiangLiming Ding
- Journals
- Advanced Materials (596 papers)ACS Nano (406 papers)Nanoscale (353 papers)ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (328 papers)Small (316 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
11.2k papers receiving 728.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
- Biomaterials 67k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 76.3k
- Materials Chemistry 165.7k
- Biomedical Engineering 144.8k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 61.8k
Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Nanoscience and Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Nanoscience and Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Nanoscience and Technology at the time of their publication.
About National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Nanoscience and Technology have published 11.5k papers, which have received a total of 741.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Biomaterials, 2.4k papers in Biomedical Engineering, 2.6k papers in Materials Chemistry, 903 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 836 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (961 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (823 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (655 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (511 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (439 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (398 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (377 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (360 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biomaterials (67k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (76.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (165.7k citations), Biomedical Engineering (144.8k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (61.8k citations). Authors at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Advanced Materials, ACS Nano, Nanoscale, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Small. Some of National Center for Nanoscience and Technology's most productive authors include Zhong Lin Wang, Zhiyong Tang, Chunying Chen, Lei Jiang, Zhixiang Wei, Yuliang Zhao, Xingyu Jiang, Liming Ding, Xing‐Jie Liang and Linjie Zhi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.