National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
Impact in
- Polymers and Plastics top 0.2%
- Conducting polymers and applications
- Materials Chemistry top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Conducting polymers and applications 1.4k
- Materials Chemistry 4.6k
- Graphene research and applications 657
- Top scholars
- Zhong Lin WangZhiyong TangChunying ChenZhixiang WeiYuliang ZhaoXingyu JiangLei JiangLiming Ding
- Journals
- Advanced Materials (580 papers)ACS Nano (395 papers)Nanoscale (334 papers)ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (330 papers)Small (306 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
11.1k papers receiving 683.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
- Polymers and Plastics 110.0k
- Materials Chemistry 281.8k
- Biomaterials 73.8k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 88.7k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 93.4k
Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Nanoscience and Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Nanoscience and Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Nanoscience and Technology at the time of their publication.
About National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Nanoscience and Technology have published 11.6k papers, which have received a total of 697.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.7k papers in Polymers and Plastics, 4.6k papers in Materials Chemistry, 1.2k papers in Biomaterials, 3.5k papers in Biomedical Engineering and 1.3k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Conducting polymers and applications (1.4k papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (1.3k papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (1.0k papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (993 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (974 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (706 papers), Graphene research and applications (657 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (610 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (110.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (281.8k citations), Biomaterials (73.8k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (88.7k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (93.4k citations). Authors at National Center for Nanoscience and Technology collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Advanced Materials, ACS Nano, Nanoscale, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Small. Some of National Center for Nanoscience and Technology's most productive authors include Zhong Lin Wang, Zhiyong Tang, Chunying Chen, Zhixiang Wei, Yuliang Zhao, Xingyu Jiang, Lei Jiang, Liming Ding, Linjie Zhi and Xing‐Jie Liang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.