Institute of Process Engineering
Impact in
- Catalysis top 0.5%
- Ionic liquids properties and applications
-
- Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
- Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Papers in
- Catalysis 1.6k
- Ionic liquids properties and applications 814
- Top scholars
- Suojiang ZhangGuanghui MaDan WangXuehai YanXiangping ZhangHongbin CaoHongzhang ChenHuizhou Liu
- Journals
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (471 papers)Chemical Engineering Journal (461 papers)Separation and Purification Technology (336 papers)Chemical Engineering Science (320 papers)RSC Advances (213 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Institute of Process Engineering
13.7k papers receiving 472.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Catalysis 51.6k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 78.9k
- Process Chemistry and Technology 13.3k
- Biomaterials 40.4k
- Materials Chemistry 140.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Process Engineering
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Process Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Process Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Process Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Process Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Process Engineering at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Process Engineering at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Process Engineering
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Process Engineering have published 14.5k papers, which have received a total of 481.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.6k papers in Catalysis, 370 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 229 papers in Filtration and Separation, 1.7k papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 1.3k papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (1.1k papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (1.0k papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (1.0k papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (814 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (714 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (648 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (645 papers) and Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (602 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Catalysis (51.6k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (78.9k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (13.3k citations), Biomaterials (40.4k citations) and Materials Chemistry (140.7k citations). Authors at Institute of Process Engineering collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Chemical Engineering Journal, Separation and Purification Technology, Chemical Engineering Science and RSC Advances. Some of Institute of Process Engineering's most productive authors include Suojiang Zhang, Guanghui Ma, Dan Wang, Xuehai Yan, Xiangping Zhang, Hongbin Cao, Hongzhang Chen, Huizhou Liu, Yinhua Wan and Jinghai Li.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.