Institute of Process Engineering
Impact in
- Catalysis top 0.2%
- Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 0.5%
Papers in
- Catalysis 1k
- Ionic liquids properties and applications 646
- Top scholars
- Suojiang ZhangGuanghui MaDan WangXuehai YanXiangping ZhangHongbin CaoHongzhang ChenHuizhou Liu
- Journals
- Chemical Engineering Journal (484 papers)Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (467 papers)Chemical Engineering Science (349 papers)Separation and Purification Technology (345 papers)Powder Technology (223 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Institute of Process Engineering
13.9k papers receiving 497.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
- Catalysis 33.5k
- Process Chemistry and Technology 7.8k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 55.8k
- Biomaterials 27.4k
- Water Science and Technology 36.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Process Engineering
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Process Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Process Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Process Engineering more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Process Engineering
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Process Engineering at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Process Engineering at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Process Engineering
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Process Engineering have published 14.6k papers, which have received a total of 501.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1k papers in Catalysis, 222 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 210 papers in Filtration and Separation, 1.2k papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 79 papers in Fuel Technology on the topics of Extraction and Separation Processes (825 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (652 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (646 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (533 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (502 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (458 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (400 papers) and Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (358 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Catalysis (33.5k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (7.8k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (55.8k citations), Biomaterials (27.4k citations) and Water Science and Technology (36.6k citations). Authors at Institute of Process Engineering collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Chemical Engineering Journal, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Chemical Engineering Science, Separation and Purification Technology and Powder Technology. Some of Institute of Process Engineering's most productive authors include Suojiang Zhang, Guanghui Ma, Dan Wang, Xuehai Yan, Xiangping Zhang, Hongbin Cao, Hongzhang Chen, Huizhou Liu, Jinghai Li and Yinhua Wan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.