National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Frailty in Older Adults 313
-
- Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention 176
- Top scholars
- Hidenori AraiKatsuhiko YanagisawaHiroyuki ShimadaKatsunori KondoTakao SuzukiKyoji IkedaTakehiko DoiMarcel E. Salive
- Journals
- Geriatrics and gerontology international (351 papers)Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (115 papers)Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (83 papers)PLoS ONE (83 papers)Scientific Reports (73 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
4.0k papers receiving 127.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 10.2k
- Biological Psychiatry 3.3k
- Physiology 30.7k
- Aging 1.9k
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 4.1k
Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology at the time of their publication.
About National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology have published 5.2k papers, which have received a total of 159.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 364 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 227 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 947 papers in Physiology, 77 papers in Biological Psychiatry and 47 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology on the topics of Nutrition and Health in Aging (371 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (317 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (313 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (274 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (189 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (176 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (121 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (111 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geriatrics and Gerontology (10.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (3.3k citations), Physiology (30.7k citations), Aging (1.9k citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (4.1k citations). Authors at National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Geriatrics and gerontology international, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports. Some of National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology's most productive authors include Hidenori Arai, Katsuhiko Yanagisawa, Hiroyuki Shimada, Katsunori Kondo, Takao Suzuki, Kyoji Ikeda, Takehiko Doi, Marcel E. Salive, Hiroshi Shimokata and Hyuma Makizako.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.