National Center for Biotechnology

20.4k citations
858 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Center for Biotechnology

693 papers receiving 19.5k citations

Peers

National Center for Biotechnology
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Endocrinology 1.2k
  • Pollution 2.2k
  • Ecology 3.4k
  • Molecular Biology 8.7k
  • Biotechnology 1.1k
Replace Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology with:
Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology Kazakhstan
Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms Russia
Institute of Immunology and Physiology Russia
National Institute of Health Pakistan
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Disease Prevention and Control Center China
Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science China
Cluster University Srinagar India
Pakistan Academy of Sciences Pakistan
National Center for Disease Control India
National Research Centre on Equines India
National Center for Biotechnology relative to Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology Kazakhstan Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Biotechnology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Biotechnology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Biotechnology at the time of their publication.

About National Center for Biotechnology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Biotechnology have published 858 papers, which have received a total of 20.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 81 papers in Infectious Diseases, 39 papers in Biotechnology, 124 papers in Genetics, 305 papers in Molecular Biology and 28 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (34 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (30 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (29 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (27 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (27 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (24 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (24 papers) and Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology (1.2k citations), Pollution (2.2k citations), Ecology (3.4k citations), Molecular Biology (8.7k citations) and Biotechnology (1.1k citations). Authors at National Center for Biotechnology collaborate with scholars in Kazakhstan, Russia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Molecular Microbiology, PLoS ONE, Plants, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Biology. Some of National Center for Biotechnology's most productive authors include Kenneth Nigel Timmis, Vı́ctor de Lorenzo, Marta Herrero, Edward R. B. Moore, Wolf‐Rainer Abraham, Andrew Mark Osborn, Irene Wagner‐Döbler, Hanno Biebl, Erlan M. Ramanculov and Alexander Revzin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact