Northern (Arctic) Federal University

25.9k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Northern (Arctic) Federal University

2.4k papers receiving 25.1k citations

Peers

Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.1k
  • Atmospheric Science 5.1k
  • Global and Planetary Change 6.0k
  • Ecology 5.7k
  • Ecological Modeling 817
Replace Karelian Research Centre with:
Karelian Research Centre Russia
Kola Science Centre Russia
Institute of Physical-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science Russia
Institute of Water Problems Russia
Department of Agricultural Sciences Russia
V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute Russia
Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre Russia
Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Russia
All-Russian Research Institute Fisheries and Oceanography Russia
Institute of Basic Biological Problems Russia
Northern (Arctic) Federal University relative to Karelian Research Centre Russia Karelian Research Centre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Karelian Research Centre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Northern (Arctic) Federal University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Northern (Arctic) Federal University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Northern (Arctic) Federal University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Northern (Arctic) Federal University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Northern (Arctic) Federal University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Northern (Arctic) Federal University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Northern (Arctic) Federal University at the time of their publication.

About Northern (Arctic) Federal University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Northern (Arctic) Federal University have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 25.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 168 papers in Geology, 13 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 17 papers in Fuel Technology, 396 papers in Ecology and 184 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (258 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (164 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (142 papers), Climate change and permafrost (127 papers), Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (120 papers), Marine and environmental studies (115 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (103 papers) and Human Health and Disease (93 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.1k citations), Atmospheric Science (5.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (6.0k citations), Ecology (5.7k citations) and Ecological Modeling (817 citations). Authors at Northern (Arctic) Federal University collaborate with scholars in Russia, France and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Ecologica Montenegrina, Water, Scientific Reports, ZooKeys and The Science of The Total Environment. Some of Northern (Arctic) Federal University's most productive authors include Oleg S. Pokrovsky, Dmitry Kosyakov, Наталья Анатольевна Демидова, Zhen Zhang, Nate G. McDowell, Michel Vennetier, Roderick John Fensham, Haroun Chenchouni, Dominique Bachelet and Thomas Kitzberger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact