Museum of Vertebrate Zoology

213.3k citations
3.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Museum of Vertebrate Zoology

3.7k papers receiving 207.6k citations

Peers

Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Ecological Modeling 36.2k
  • Paleontology 43.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 48.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 60.6k
  • Ecology 73.9k
Replace California Academy of Sciences with:
California Academy of Sciences United States
Scripps Institution of Oceanography United States
Northern Arizona University United States
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife United States
Carnegie Department of Plant Biology United States
University of Montana United States
College of Marin United States
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County United States
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center United States
Pacific Southwest Research Station United States
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology relative to California Academy of Sciences United States California Academy of Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
California Academy of Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Museum of Vertebrate Zoology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Museum of Vertebrate Zoology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Museum of Vertebrate Zoology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Museum of Vertebrate Zoology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the time of their publication.

About Museum of Vertebrate Zoology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Museum of Vertebrate Zoology have published 3.9k papers, which have received a total of 213.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 977 papers in Paleontology, 526 papers in Ecological Modeling, 1.2k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 729 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 1.5k papers in Ecology on the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (776 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (755 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (694 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (608 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (526 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (519 papers), Plant and animal studies (421 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (333 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (36.2k citations), Paleontology (43.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (48.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (60.6k citations) and Ecology (73.9k citations). Authors at Museum of Vertebrate Zoology collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Mammalogy, Ornithological Applications, Evolution, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and The Auk. Some of Museum of Vertebrate Zoology's most productive authors include David B. Wake, Robert J. Hijmans, Juan L. Parra, Susan E. Cameron, Craig Moritz, Peter G. Jones, Andy Jarvis, Montgomery Slatkin, James L. Patton and Anthony D. Barnosky.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact