William James College
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 66
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 40
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 52
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 49
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 30
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 28
- Top scholars
- Randy L. BucknerDaniel L. SchacterJessica R. Andrews‐HannaJames M. RobinsMiguel A. HernánBabette BrumbackStephen M. KosslynJason P. Mitchell
- Journals
- Cognition (21 papers)Trends in Cognitive Sciences (17 papers)NeuroImage (9 papers)Sociological Forum (9 papers)Perception (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
William James College
797 papers receiving 57.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
- Cognitive Neuroscience 23.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 10.0k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 7.8k
- Statistics and Probability 3.9k
- Social Psychology 9.3k
Countries citing scholars working at William James College
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at William James College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at William James College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William James College more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at William James College
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with William James College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with William James College at the time of their publication.
About William James College
In recent decades, authors affiliated with William James College have published 950 papers, which have received a total of 63.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 234 papers in Clinical Psychology, 217 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 124 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 42 papers in Applied Psychology and 12 papers in General Psychology on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (66 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (52 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (49 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (40 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (33 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (33 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (30 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (23.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (10.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (7.8k citations), Statistics and Probability (3.9k citations) and Social Psychology (9.3k citations). Authors at William James College collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Cognition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, NeuroImage, Sociological Forum and Perception. Some of William James College's most productive authors include Randy L. Buckner, Daniel L. Schacter, Jessica R. Andrews‐Hanna, James M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernán, Babette Brumback, Stephen M. Kosslyn, Jason P. Mitchell, Daniel Carroll and John Daugman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.