Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

49.4k citations
4.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

2.8k papers receiving 38.4k citations

Peers

Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8.8k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 1.1k
  • General Psychology 678
  • History 4.1k
  • Anthropology 3.4k
Replace Bielefeld University with:
Bielefeld University Germany
Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Netherlands
University of Konstanz Germany
Roskilde University Denmark
University of Warsaw Poland
University of Potsdam Germany
École des hautes études en sciences sociales France
Osnabrück University Germany
University of Fribourg Switzerland
Birkbeck, University of London United Kingdom
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science relative to Bielefeld University Germany Bielefeld University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Bielefeld University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Max Planck Institute for the History of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Planck Institute for the History of Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for the History of Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for the History of Science at the time of their publication.

About Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Max Planck Institute for the History of Science have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 49.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 959 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 115 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 61 papers in General Psychology, 384 papers in History and 278 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (226 papers), History of Science and Medicine (213 papers), History of Science and Natural History (186 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (173 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (145 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (138 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (117 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (115 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on History and Philosophy of Science (8.8k citations), Theoretical Computer Science (1.1k citations), General Psychology (678 citations), History (4.1k citations) and Anthropology (3.4k citations). Authors at Max Planck Institute for the History of Science collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Isis, Science in Context, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Some of Max Planck Institute for the History of Science's most productive authors include Lorraine Daston, Hans‐Jörg Rheinberger, Robert Schlögl, Jürgen Renn, Manfred D. Laubichler, Stefan H. E. Kaufmann, Londa Schiebinger, Ursula Klein, Fernando Vidal and Staffan Müller‐Wille.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact