Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
Impact in
-
- Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
- Agriculture and Biological Studies
-
- Economic Issues in Ukraine
Papers in
-
- Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine 135
- Agriculture and Biological Studies 131
-
- Economic Issues in Ukraine 151
- Top scholars
- Valerii HavryshАнтонина КалиниченкоВіталій НіценкоOleg BazalukDalia ŠtreimikienėTomas BaležentisGrzegorz MentelYuriy Kondratenko
In The Last Decade
Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
551 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 645
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 386
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 459
- General Energy 28
- Economics and Econometrics 671
Countries citing scholars working at Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Mykolayiv National Agrarian University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Mykolayiv National Agrarian University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mykolayiv National Agrarian University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Mykolayiv National Agrarian University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Mykolayiv National Agrarian University at the time of their publication.
About Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Mykolayiv National Agrarian University have published 769 papers, which have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 255 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 162 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 160 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 241 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 55 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Economic and Business Development Strategies (180 papers), Economic Issues in Ukraine (151 papers), Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine (135 papers), Business and Economic Development (135 papers), Agriculture and Biological Studies (131 papers), Diverse Scientific Research in Ukraine (70 papers), Labor Market and Education (56 papers) and Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (645 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (386 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (459 citations), General Energy (28 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (671 citations). Authors at Mykolayiv National Agrarian University collaborate with scholars in Ukraine, Poland and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Energies, Sustainability, Applied Sciences, International Applied Mechanics and Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. Some of Mykolayiv National Agrarian University's most productive authors include Valerii Havrysh, Антонина Калиниченко, Віталій Ніценко, Oleg Bazaluk, Dalia Štreimikienė, Tomas Baležentis, Grzegorz Mentel, Yuriy Kondratenko, Volodymyr Lagodiienko and Olha Yatsenkо.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.