MetLife (United States)

8.0k citations
309 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

MetLife (United States)

223 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

MetLife (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • General Health Professions 1.8k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 227
  • Gender Studies 674
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 42
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 365
Replace Boston Public Library with:
Boston Public Library United States
Hebrew Home United States
Pew Research Center United States
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship United States
Community Connections United States
EngenderHealth United States
Gwynedd Mercy University United States
Barrett Technology (United States) United States
American Diabetes Association United States
Community Foundation United States
MetLife (United States) relative to Boston Public Library United States Boston Public Library's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Boston Public Library · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at MetLife (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at MetLife (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at MetLife (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MetLife (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at MetLife (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with MetLife (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with MetLife (United States) at the time of their publication.

About MetLife (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with MetLife (United States) have published 309 papers, which have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 31 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Finance, 2 papers in General Decision Sciences and 26 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (1.8k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (227 citations), Gender Studies (674 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (42 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (365 citations). Authors at MetLife (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Diabetes, Journal of Marketing Research, Anesthesiology, Journal of Marketing and Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Some of MetLife (United States)'s most productive authors include Virginia E. Schein, C. Hawes, Charles D. Phillips, V Mor, Brant E. Fries, Jack Morris, Herbert H. Marks, Timothy S. Carey, Arthur E. Blank and John Billings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact