MetLife (United States)

6.8k citations
261 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

MetLife (United States)

186 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

MetLife (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 468
  • General Health Professions 2.6k
  • Gender Studies 642
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 663
Replace RELX Group (United States) with:
RELX Group (United States) United States
National Health Law Program United States
Hebrew Home United States
Boston Public Library United States
Pew Research Center United States
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship United States
National Public Radio United States
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research United States
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Canada
Community Connections United States
MetLife (United States) relative to RELX Group (United States) United States RELX Group (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
RELX Group (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at MetLife (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at MetLife (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at MetLife (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MetLife (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at MetLife (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with MetLife (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with MetLife (United States) at the time of their publication.

About MetLife (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with MetLife (United States) have published 261 papers, which have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 30 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Finance, 2 papers in General Dentistry and 2 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (4 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geriatrics and Gerontology (468 citations), General Health Professions (2.6k citations), Gender Studies (642 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (64 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (663 citations). Authors at MetLife (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Diabetes, Anesthesiology, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content and Air Medical Journal. Some of MetLife (United States)'s most productive authors include Virginia E. Schein, Jack Morris, Charles D. Phillips, Brant E. Fries, V Mor, C. Hawes, Herbert H. Marks, John Billings, Timothy S. Carey and Arthur E. Blank.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact