Mitchell Institute

687.7k citations
21.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods 1.7k
    • Drilling and Well Engineering 1.2k
    • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques 791
    • Oil and Gas Production Techniques 554

Mitchell Institute

18.5k papers receiving 624.9k citations

Peers

Mitchell Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 49.9k
  • Strategy and Management 70.6k
  • Accounting 36.8k
  • Ocean Engineering 53.8k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 23.2k
Replace Dartmouth College with:
Dartmouth College United States
Harvard University Press United States
University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
Northeastern University United States
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute United States
Queen's University Canada
University of Delaware United States
Syracuse University United States
Drexel University United States
Boston College United States
Mitchell Institute relative to Dartmouth College United States Dartmouth College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Dartmouth College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Mitchell Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Mitchell Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Mitchell Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Mitchell Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Mitchell Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Mitchell Institute at the time of their publication.

About Mitchell Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Mitchell Institute have published 21.0k papers, which have received a total of 687.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.0k papers in Ocean Engineering, 203 papers in Architecture, 2.9k papers in Mechanical Engineering, 1.0k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 270 papers in Instrumentation on the topics of Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (2.2k papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (1.7k papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (1.2k papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (791 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (587 papers), Oil and Gas Production Techniques (554 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (408 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (406 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (49.9k citations), Strategy and Management (70.6k citations), Accounting (36.8k citations), Ocean Engineering (53.8k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (23.2k citations). Authors at Mitchell Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, SPE Journal, Journal of High Energy Physics, American Journal of Agricultural Economics and Physical review. D. Some of Mitchell Institute's most productive authors include Jay Bryan Barney, Guoyao Wu, James A. Calvin, Kenneth J. Meier, Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din, Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy, Michael A. Hitt, R. Duane Ireland and Wendy Wood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact