Massachusetts General Hospital

9.4M citations
169.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Massachusetts General Hospital

144.9k papers receiving 8.1M citations

Peers

Massachusetts General Hospital
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Oncology 764.9k
  • Molecular Biology 2.1M
  • Aging 54.3k
  • Cancer Research 407.9k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 410.8k
Replace Brigham and Women's Hospital with:
Brigham and Women's Hospital United States
Boston University United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
National Institutes of Health United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine United States
Boston Children's Hospital United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai United States
Howard Hughes Medical Institute United States
Tufts University United States
Massachusetts General Hospital relative to Brigham and Women's Hospital United States Brigham and Women's Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Brigham and Women's Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Massachusetts General Hospital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Massachusetts General Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Massachusetts General Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massachusetts General Hospital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Massachusetts General Hospital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital at the time of their publication.

About Massachusetts General Hospital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital have published 169.6k papers, which have received a total of 9.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 12.4k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 17.1k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 21.9k papers in Surgery, 7.6k papers in Neurology and 7.3k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2.6k papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2.5k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2.0k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.0k papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1.8k papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1.7k papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1.7k papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oncology (764.9k citations), Molecular Biology (2.1M citations), Aging (54.3k citations), Cancer Research (407.9k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (410.8k citations). Authors at Massachusetts General Hospital collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Journal of Biological Chemistry. Some of Massachusetts General Hospital's most productive authors include Ralph Weissleder, Michael R. Hamblin, Bruce R. Fischl, Randy Lee Buckner, Joseph Biederman, Bradley T. Hyman, Anders Martin Dale, Jack W. Szostak, Clifford J. Woolf and Jeremy Dan Schmahmann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact