Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
- Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Papers in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 286
- Ecology 554
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 312
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 194
- Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior 74
- Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes 68
- Ecology and biodiversity studies 68
- Top scholars
- Clint C. MuhlfeldDavid A. SchmetterlingKelly M. ProffittThomas E. McMahonJustin A. GudeBradley B. ShepardFred W. AllendorfCharlie E. Smith
- Journals
- Journal of Wildlife Management (83 papers)North American Journal of Fisheries Management (79 papers)Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (45 papers)Ecosphere (24 papers)Journal of Wildlife Diseases (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
770 papers receiving 20.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 7.7k
- Ecology 14.4k
- Ecological Modeling 2.2k
- Aquatic Science 1.8k
- Small Animals 1.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks at the time of their publication.
About Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks have published 834 papers, which have received a total of 21.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 353 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 554 papers in Ecology, 79 papers in Ecological Modeling, 89 papers in Aquatic Science and 52 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (312 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (286 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (194 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (79 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (75 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (74 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (68 papers) and Ecology and biodiversity studies (68 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (7.7k citations), Ecology (14.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.2k citations), Aquatic Science (1.8k citations) and Small Animals (1.5k citations). Authors at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Wildlife Management, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Ecosphere and Journal of Wildlife Diseases. Some of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks's most productive authors include Clint C. Muhlfeld, David A. Schmetterling, Kelly M. Proffitt, Thomas E. McMahon, Justin A. Gude, Bradley B. Shepard, Fred W. Allendorf, Charlie E. Smith, Robert A. Garrott and Kenneth L. Hamlin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.