Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Avian ecology and behavior
Papers in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 210
- Ecology 341
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 250
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 67
- Avian ecology and behavior 33
- Top scholars
- Clint C. MuhlfeldDavid A. SchmetterlingKelly M. ProffittJustin A. GudeRobert A. GarrottKenneth L. HamlinRichard D. MaceBradley B. Shepard
- Journals
- Journal of Wildlife Management (81 papers)North American Journal of Fisheries Management (69 papers)Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (35 papers)Ecosphere (17 papers)Biological Conservation (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
646 papers receiving 17.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.2k
- Ecology 8.8k
- Ecological Modeling 407
- Genetics 1.9k
- Small Animals 423
Countries citing scholars working at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks at the time of their publication.
About Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks have published 679 papers, which have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 217 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 341 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Ecological Modeling, 21 papers in Aquatic Science and 19 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (250 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (210 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (67 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (42 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (33 papers), Myxozoan Parasites in Aquatic Species (22 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (19 papers) and Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.2k citations), Ecology (8.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (407 citations), Genetics (1.9k citations) and Small Animals (423 citations). Authors at Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Wildlife Management, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Ecosphere and Biological Conservation. Some of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks's most productive authors include Clint C. Muhlfeld, David A. Schmetterling, Kelly M. Proffitt, Justin A. Gude, Robert A. Garrott, Kenneth L. Hamlin, Richard D. Mace, Bradley B. Shepard, Nicholas J. DeCesare and Thomas E. McMahon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.