Mass General Brigham

5.2k papers receiving 243.5k citations

Peers

Mass General Brigham
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Health Information Management 16.1k
  • Health Informatics 2.2k
  • Family Practice 2.1k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 3.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 14.5k
Replace Boston Medical Center with:
Boston Medical Center United States
New York Hospital Queens United States
Tufts Medical Center United States
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center United States
Yale New Haven Hospital United States
McGill University Health Centre Canada
Rhode Island Hospital United States
NYU Langone Health United States
Weill Cornell Medicine United States
Montefiore Medical Center United States
Mass General Brigham relative to Boston Medical Center United States Boston Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Boston Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Mass General Brigham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Mass General Brigham. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Mass General Brigham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mass General Brigham more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Mass General Brigham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Mass General Brigham at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Mass General Brigham at the time of their publication.

About Mass General Brigham

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Mass General Brigham have published 6.6k papers, which have received a total of 312.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 405 papers in Health Information Management, 71 papers in Health Informatics, 59 papers in Family Practice, 172 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 6 papers in Medical Terminology on the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (370 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (135 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (125 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (114 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (107 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (98 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (97 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (96 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Information Management (16.1k citations), Health Informatics (2.2k citations), Family Practice (2.1k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (3.8k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (14.5k citations). Authors at Mass General Brigham collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of the American College of Radiology and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. Some of Mass General Brigham's most productive authors include David W. Bates, Andrew D. Luster, David Blumenthal, Bruce D. Walker, Heidi L. Rehm, Georg M. Lauer, Blackford Middleton, Eugene Braunwald, Thomas H. Lee and Timothy E. Wilens.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact