Children's Medical Research Institute

128.3k citations
2.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 124
    • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 111
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 88

Children's Medical Research Institute

2.5k papers receiving 109.3k citations

Peers

Children's Medical Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Aging 2.5k
  • Physiology 19.8k
  • Molecular Biology 52.5k
  • Biological Psychiatry 1.2k
  • Cell Biology 8.6k
Replace Concord Repatriation General Hospital with:
Concord Repatriation General Hospital Australia
Westmead Institute Australia
Diabetes Australia Australia
St Vincent's Clinic Australia
The Heart Research Institute Australia
Hunter Medical Research Institute Australia
Monash Institute of Medical Research Australia
Translational Research Institute Australia
Department of Veterans Affairs Australia
John Hunter Hospital Australia
Children's Medical Research Institute relative to Concord Repatriation General Hospital Australia Concord Repatriation General Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Concord Repatriation General Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Children's Medical Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Children's Medical Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Children's Medical Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Children's Medical Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Children's Medical Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Children's Medical Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Children's Medical Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Children's Medical Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Children's Medical Research Institute have published 2.9k papers, which have received a total of 128.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 30 papers in Aging, 1.1k papers in Molecular Biology, 353 papers in Physiology, 76 papers in Microbiology and 345 papers in Genetics on the topics of Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (180 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (134 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (124 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (111 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (108 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (98 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (88 papers) and Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (87 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aging (2.5k citations), Physiology (19.8k citations), Molecular Biology (52.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (1.2k citations) and Cell Biology (8.6k citations). Authors at Children's Medical Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Burns, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Development. Some of Children's Medical Research Institute's most productive authors include Roger R. Reddel, Patrick Tam, Phillip J. Robinson, Tracy M. Bryan, Peter D. Sly, Rosana Norman, Theo Vos, Ian E. Alexander, Anne B. Chang and Peter W. Gunning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact