MaRS

51k citations
764 papers ·

Impact in

  • Genetics top 10%
    • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
    • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Papers in

MaRS

739 papers receiving 50.9k citations

Peers

MaRS
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Genetics 8.3k
  • Molecular Biology 14.7k
  • Cancer Research 2k
  • Cell Biology 1.2k
  • Oncology 1.8k
Replace Centre for Applied Genomics with:
Centre for Applied Genomics Canada
Center for Information Technology United States
Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research Canada
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Division of Intramural Research United States
New York Genome Center United States
McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre Canada
Simons Foundation United States
Michigan Center for Translational Pathology United States
Quest Diagnostics (United States) United States
Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology
MaRS relative to Centre for Applied Genomics Canada Centre for Applied Genomics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Centre for Applied Genomics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at MaRS

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at MaRS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at MaRS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MaRS more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at MaRS

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with MaRS at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with MaRS at the time of their publication.

About MaRS

In recent decades, authors affiliated with MaRS have published 764 papers, which have received a total of 51k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 195 papers in Molecular Biology, 38 papers in Cancer Research, 59 papers in Genetics, 41 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 22 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (32 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (26 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (18 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (18 papers), Quantum many-body systems (17 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (17 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (17 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Genetics (8.3k citations), Molecular Biology (14.7k citations), Cancer Research (2k citations), Cell Biology (1.2k citations) and Oncology (1.8k citations). Authors at MaRS collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Communications, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal and Scientific Reports. Some of MaRS's most productive authors include Paul Christopher Boutros, Hanbo Chen, Stephen W. Scherer, Gordon M. Keller, Mark D. Yandell, Carson Holt, Charles E. Murry, Lars Feuk, Andrew R. Carson and Juan Carrasquilla.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact