Marist University

1.0k papers receiving 16.2k citations

Peers

Marist University
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Communication 871
  • Computer Science Applications 682
  • Public Administration 382
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 972
  • Management Information Systems 878
Replace Sacred Heart University with:
Sacred Heart University United States
Ramapo College United States
SUNY Oneonta United States
Siena College United States
American Association For The Advancement of Science United States
Shippensburg University United States
Le Moyne College United States
Christopher Newport University United States
Social Science Research Council United States
Empire State University United States
Marist University relative to Sacred Heart University United States Sacred Heart University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Sacred Heart University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Marist University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Marist University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Marist University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marist University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Marist University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Marist University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Marist University at the time of their publication.

About Marist University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Marist University have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 17.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Public Administration, 67 papers in Communication, 49 papers in Paleontology, 61 papers in Finance and 71 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology on the topics of Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy (44 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (29 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (27 papers), Digital Games and Media (26 papers), Social Media and Politics (25 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (23 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (23 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Communication (871 citations), Computer Science Applications (682 citations), Public Administration (382 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (972 citations) and Management Information Systems (878 citations). Authors at Marist University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Subterranean Biology, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Administrative Theory & Praxis and European Journal of Operational Research. Some of Marist University's most productive authors include Kavous Ardalan, Richard A. Barker, Karen Schrier, Eitel J. M. Lauría, Ryan Patricia Rogers, G. Scott Erickson, Duy Nguyen, Helen N. Rothberg, Elizabeth F. Purinton and Justin Kirkby.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact