University of Mannheim

14.2k papers receiving 501.3k citations

Peers

University of Mannheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • General Decision Sciences 7.9k
  • Applied Psychology 13.3k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 27.3k
  • Marketing 24.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 29.1k
Replace Eindhoven University of Technology with:
Eindhoven University of Technology Netherlands
Tilburg University Netherlands
Maastricht University Netherlands
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg Germany
Universität Innsbruck Austria
University of St.Gallen Switzerland
Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Netherlands
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Netherlands
Ghent University Hospital Belgium
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
University of Mannheim relative to Eindhoven University of Technology Netherlands Eindhoven University of Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Eindhoven University of Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Mannheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Mannheim. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Mannheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Mannheim more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Mannheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Mannheim at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Mannheim at the time of their publication.

About University of Mannheim

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Mannheim have published 16.9k papers, which have received a total of 561.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 280 papers in General Decision Sciences, 1.1k papers in Strategy and Management, 651 papers in Finance, 317 papers in Applied Psychology and 1.7k papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (587 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (419 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (389 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (349 papers), Topic Modeling (312 papers), Social Media and Politics (298 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (285 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (280 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (7.9k citations), Applied Psychology (13.3k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (27.3k citations), Marketing (24.1k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (29.1k citations). Authors at University of Mannheim collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Association for Information Systems, European Journal of Political Research, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, European Journal of Social Psychology and Frontiers in Psychology. Some of University of Mannheim's most productive authors include Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, Franz Faul, Albert-Georg Lang, Christian Homburg, Sabine Sonnentag, Heiko Paulheim, Julian Francis Thayer, Dirk Ifenthaler and Jost Bruno Jonas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact