The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research

21.5k citations
270 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research

251 papers receiving 21.5k citations

Peers

The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 5.1k
  • Immunology 3.4k
  • Molecular Biology 9k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.4k
  • Aging 99
Replace Bourn Hall Clinic with:
Bourn Hall Clinic United Kingdom
PremUP France
National Cancer Research Institute United Kingdom
Netherlands Metabolomics Centre Netherlands
Physiopathologie et pharmacotoxicologie placentaire humaine : Microbiote pré & post natal France
Phénotypage et ingénierie précliniques des systèmes d’organismes modèles France
Igenomix Spain
Service de Recherches en Hémato-Immunologie France
Analyse moléculaire, modélisation et imagerie de la maladie cancéreuse France
Epigénétique et Destin Cellulaire France
The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research relative to Bourn Hall Clinic United Kingdom Bourn Hall Clinic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Bourn Hall Clinic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research at the time of their publication.

About The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research have published 270 papers, which have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 91 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 32 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 47 papers in Immunology, 97 papers in Molecular Biology and 21 papers in Genetics on the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (87 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (49 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (37 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (25 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (23 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (19 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (15 papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (5.1k citations), Immunology (3.4k citations), Molecular Biology (9k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.4k citations) and Aging (99 citations). Authors at The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Placenta, The Journal of Physiology, Nature Communications, Nature and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Some of The Loke Centre for Trophoblast Research's most productive authors include Graham J. Burton, Eric R. M. Jauniaux, Wolf Reik, Gavin Kelsey, Ashley Moffett, Amanda Nancy Sferruzzi-Perri, Francesco Colucci, John C. Kingdom, Allison Woods and Simon Andrews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact