Technical Solutions (United States)

607 papers receiving 16.0k citations

Peers

Technical Solutions (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Transportation 2.1k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 926
  • Human-Computer Interaction 764
  • Control and Systems Engineering 2.9k
  • Building and Construction 1.5k
Replace Applied Technologies (United States) with:
Applied Technologies (United States) United States
Caterpillar (United States) United States
Construction Engineering Research Laboratory United States
Simulation Technologies (United States) United States
Mountain View College United States
Photometrics (United States) United States
Marina Del Rey Hospital United States
University of Wisconsin–Platteville United States
Naval Information Warfare Systems Command United States
Detection Limit (United States) United States
Technical Solutions (United States) relative to Applied Technologies (United States) United States Applied Technologies (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×78.1×
Applied Technologies (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Technical Solutions (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Technical Solutions (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Technical Solutions (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technical Solutions (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Technical Solutions (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Technical Solutions (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Technical Solutions (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Technical Solutions (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Technical Solutions (United States) have published 734 papers, which have received a total of 16.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 6 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology, 28 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 17 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 65 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (49 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (26 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (18 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (16 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (16 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (15 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Transportation (2.1k citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (926 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (764 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (2.9k citations) and Building and Construction (1.5k citations). Authors at Technical Solutions (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Process Safety Progress, Vision Research, Operations Research, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Anesthesiology. Some of Technical Solutions (United States)'s most productive authors include P.I. Richards, Yang‐Tse Cheng, Lawrence J. Hettinger, Mark W. Cannon, Glenn F. Wilson, Joseph G. Sebranek, James N. Bacus, Nicolaas Bouwes, Steven C. Fullenkamp and Carolyne Swain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact