Laboratoire de Chimie

567.1k citations
19.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Laboratoire de Chimie

18.7k papers receiving 554.7k citations

Peers

Laboratoire de Chimie
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Organic Chemistry 122.8k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 57.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 159.4k
  • Spectroscopy 50.9k
  • Biochemistry 16.9k
Replace Institut de Chimie with:
Institut de Chimie France
CEA Grenoble France
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté France
École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier France
Laboratoire de Chimie Organique France
Chimie ParisTech France
Laboratoire de Chimie Physique France
Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung Germany
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research Germany
Novartis (Switzerland) Switzerland
Laboratoire de Chimie relative to Institut de Chimie France Institut de Chimie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Institut de Chimie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Laboratoire de Chimie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Laboratoire de Chimie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Laboratoire de Chimie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laboratoire de Chimie more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Laboratoire de Chimie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Laboratoire de Chimie at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Laboratoire de Chimie at the time of their publication.

About Laboratoire de Chimie

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Laboratoire de Chimie have published 19.4k papers, which have received a total of 567.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.3k papers in Organic Chemistry, 2.4k papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 2.3k papers in Spectroscopy, 5.1k papers in Materials Chemistry and 2.0k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (967 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (746 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (631 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (623 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (607 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (578 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (568 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (540 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organic Chemistry (122.8k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (57.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (159.4k citations), Spectroscopy (50.9k citations) and Biochemistry (16.9k citations). Authors at Laboratoire de Chimie collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A and Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. Some of Laboratoire de Chimie's most productive authors include Claudette Berset, Marie‐Elisabeth Cuvelier, Martin Karplus, Jean‐Pierre Sauvage, Bernard Valeur, Augustin Scalbert, R. Massart, Philippe Sautet, Stratis Avraméas and Jean‐Paul Behr.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact