Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
Impact in
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Material Dynamics and Properties
- Graphene research and applications
- 2D Materials and Applications
Papers in
-
- Theoretical and Computational Physics 145
- GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials 115
-
- Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices 141
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena 128
- Top scholars
- Ludovic BerthierGiulio BiroliBernard GilGuillaume CassaboisMauro AntezzaWalter KobPierre ValvinW. Knap
- Journals
- Physical review. B. (128 papers)Physical Review Letters (117 papers)Soft Matter (59 papers)Applied Physics Letters (45 papers)Physical review. E (43 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
2.1k papers receiving 58.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Condensed Matter Physics 7.6k
- Materials Chemistry 25.6k
- Ceramics and Composites 2.8k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 13.5k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 6.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Laboratoire Charles Coulomb. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Laboratoire Charles Coulomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laboratoire Charles Coulomb more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Laboratoire Charles Coulomb at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Laboratoire Charles Coulomb at the time of their publication.
About Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Laboratoire Charles Coulomb have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 60.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 329 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 686 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 917 papers in Materials Chemistry, 106 papers in Ceramics and Composites and 227 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Material Dynamics and Properties (254 papers), Graphene research and applications (199 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (145 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (141 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (128 papers), Terahertz technology and applications (119 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (115 papers) and Glass properties and applications (99 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (7.6k citations), Materials Chemistry (25.6k citations), Ceramics and Composites (2.8k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (13.5k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (6.4k citations). Authors at Laboratoire Charles Coulomb collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Soft Matter, Applied Physics Letters and Physical review. E. Some of Laboratoire Charles Coulomb's most productive authors include Ludovic Berthier, Giulio Biroli, Bernard Gil, Guillaume Cassabois, Mauro Antezza, Walter Kob, Pierre Valvin, W. Knap, Julian Oberdisse and Brahim Guizal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.