University of L'Aquila

750.6k citations
31.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of L'Aquila

30k papers receiving 749.7k citations

Peers

University of L'Aquila
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 27.3k
  • Software 6.6k
  • Atmospheric Science 15.7k
  • Molecular Medicine 7.3k
  • Control and Systems Engineering 25.7k
Replace University of Pisa with:
University of Pisa Italy
University of Naples Federico II Italy
University of Genoa Italy
University of Bari Aldo Moro Italy
University of Rome Tor Vergata Italy
National Research Council Italy
University of Bologna Italy
University of Florence Italy
University of Catania Italy
University of Milano-Bicocca Italy
University of L'Aquila relative to University of Pisa Italy University of Pisa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Pisa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of L'Aquila

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of L'Aquila. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of L'Aquila with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of L'Aquila more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of L'Aquila

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of L'Aquila at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of L'Aquila at the time of their publication.

About University of L'Aquila

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of L'Aquila have published 31.7k papers, which have received a total of 750.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 409 papers in Software, 908 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 938 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 1.3k papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 299 papers in Orthodontics on the topics of Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (412 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (370 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (360 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (317 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (281 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (264 papers), Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression (246 papers) and Optical Network Technologies (244 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (27.3k citations), Software (6.6k citations), Atmospheric Science (15.7k citations), Molecular Medicine (7.3k citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (25.7k citations). Authors at University of L'Aquila collaborate with scholars in Italy, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Molecular Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Physical Review Letters, Applied Sciences and PLoS ONE. Some of University of L'Aquila's most productive authors include Carlo Cecati, Marco Ferrari, Valentina Quaresima, Antonio Arcadi, Francesco Vegliò, Angelo Luongo, Sandro Santucci, Francesco Lambiase, Pierdomenico Pepe and Idiano D’Adamo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact