Lamsade

40.7k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Lamsade

2.1k papers receiving 40.7k citations

Peers

Lamsade
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Management Science and Operations Research 13k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 7.4k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 2.7k
  • Artificial Intelligence 4.6k
  • Economics and Econometrics 3.5k
Replace LIP6 with:
LIP6 France
The Alan Turing Institute United Kingdom
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales France
Heuristics and Diagnostics for Complex Systems France
Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique France
Max Planck Institute for Informatics Germany
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research Switzerland
Centre Inria de l'Université Grenoble Alpes France
Laboratoire des signaux et systèmes France
Lamsade relative to LIP6 France LIP6's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
LIP6 · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Lamsade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lamsade. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lamsade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lamsade more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Lamsade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lamsade at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lamsade at the time of their publication.

About Lamsade

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lamsade have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 40.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 704 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 378 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 129 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 384 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 295 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (383 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (314 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (277 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (250 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (119 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (73 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (56 papers) and Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Science and Operations Research (13k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (7.4k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (2.7k citations), Artificial Intelligence (4.6k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (3.5k citations). Authors at Lamsade collaborate with scholars in France, Italy and United States and have published in prestigious journals including European Journal of Operational Research, Theoretical Computer Science, Discrete Applied Mathematics, Lecture notes in computer science and Computers & Operations Research. Some of Lamsade's most productive authors include Bernard Roy, Vincent Mousseau, José Rui Figueira, Alexis Tsoukiàs, Daniel Vanderpooten, Jérôme Lang, Denis Bouyssou A, Roman Słowiński, Vangélis Th. Paschos and Tristan Cazenave.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact