Korea National Arboretum

6.3k citations
854 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Korea National Arboretum

763 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

Korea National Arboretum
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.7k
  • Plant Science 2.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 138
  • Genetics 761
  • Insect Science 254
Replace National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology with:
National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology South Korea
Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources South Korea
National Fisheries University Japan
Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea South Korea
National Institute of Ecology South Korea
Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services South Korea
Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center China
Zhejiang Academy of Forestry China
Korea National Arboretum relative to National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology South Korea National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Korea National Arboretum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Korea National Arboretum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Korea National Arboretum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korea National Arboretum more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Korea National Arboretum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Korea National Arboretum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Korea National Arboretum at the time of their publication.

About Korea National Arboretum

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Korea National Arboretum have published 854 papers, which have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 323 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 361 papers in Plant Science, 140 papers in Genetics, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling and 27 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (163 papers), Ecology and Conservation Studies (154 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (72 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (64 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (53 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (41 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (41 papers) and Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (37 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.7k citations), Plant Science (2.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (138 citations), Genetics (761 citations) and Insect Science (254 citations). Authors at Korea National Arboretum collaborate with scholars in South Korea, China and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, ZooKeys, Zootaxa, Plants and Frontiers in Plant Science. Some of Korea National Arboretum's most productive authors include Jeong‐Ho Lee, Bong‐Kyu Byun, Sang-Yong Kim, Joo‐Hwan Kim, Kae Sun Chang, Balkrishna Ghimire, Kyung Hwa Choi, Dong Chan Son, Jongok Lim and Chung-Hee Lee.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact