Kunming Institute of Botany

231.2k citations
10.8k papers ·

Impact in

  • Pharmacology top 0.5%
    • Fungal Biology and Applications
    • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities

Papers in

Kunming Institute of Botany

9.9k papers receiving 215.6k citations

Peers

Kunming Institute of Botany
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Pharmacology 19.7k
  • Plant Science 83.3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 41.3k
  • Pharmacology 31.7k
  • Molecular Biology 98.5k
Replace Sichuan Agricultural University with:
Sichuan Agricultural University China
Northwest A&F University China
Chengdu Institute of Biology China
Yunnan Agricultural University China
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden China
South China Botanical Garden China
Huazhong Agricultural University China
Hunan Agricultural University China
Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences China
Kunming Institute of Botany relative to Sichuan Agricultural University China Sichuan Agricultural University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Sichuan Agricultural University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Kunming Institute of Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Kunming Institute of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Kunming Institute of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kunming Institute of Botany more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Kunming Institute of Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Kunming Institute of Botany at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Kunming Institute of Botany at the time of their publication.

About Kunming Institute of Botany

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Kunming Institute of Botany have published 10.8k papers, which have received a total of 231.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.7k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.1k papers in Pharmacology, 4.4k papers in Plant Science, 1.7k papers in Pharmacology and 5.6k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1.3k papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (1.3k papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (1.2k papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (1.1k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.1k papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (1.0k papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (960 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (749 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmacology (19.7k citations), Plant Science (83.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (41.3k citations), Pharmacology (31.7k citations) and Molecular Biology (98.5k citations). Authors at Kunming Institute of Botany collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Thailand and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Phytochemistry, Journal of Natural Products, Natural Products and Bioprospecting and Fitoterapia. Some of Kunming Institute of Botany's most productive authors include Jianchu Xu, Li D, Ji‐Kai Liu, Hang Sun, Han‐Dong Sun, Xiao‐Jiang Hao, Kevin D. Hyde, Xiao‐Dong Luo, Ying‐Jun Zhang and Ting‐Shuang Yi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact