Kunming Institute of Botany

261.3k citations
11.1k papers ·

Impact in

    • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
  • Pharmacology top 0.5%
    • Fungal Biology and Applications

Papers in

Kunming Institute of Botany

10.2k papers receiving 241.4k citations

Peers

Kunming Institute of Botany
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Plant Science 98.0k
  • Pharmacology 20.8k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 46.8k
  • Pharmacology 36.2k
  • Cell Biology 28.8k
Replace Sichuan Agricultural University with:
Sichuan Agricultural University China
Yunnan Agricultural University China
Chengdu Institute of Biology China
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden China
South China Botanical Garden China
Hunan Agricultural University China
Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences China
Southwest Forestry University China
National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Thailand
Kunming Institute of Botany relative to Sichuan Agricultural University China Sichuan Agricultural University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Sichuan Agricultural University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Kunming Institute of Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Kunming Institute of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Kunming Institute of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kunming Institute of Botany more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Kunming Institute of Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Kunming Institute of Botany at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Kunming Institute of Botany at the time of their publication.

About Kunming Institute of Botany

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Kunming Institute of Botany have published 11.1k papers, which have received a total of 261.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.8k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.1k papers in Pharmacology, 4.6k papers in Plant Science, 1.7k papers in Pharmacology and 5.7k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1.3k papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (1.3k papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (1.2k papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (1.1k papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (1.1k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.1k papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.0k papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (787 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (98.0k citations), Pharmacology (20.8k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (46.8k citations), Pharmacology (36.2k citations) and Cell Biology (28.8k citations). Authors at Kunming Institute of Botany collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Thailand and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Phytochemistry, Journal of Natural Products, Acta Botanica Yunnanica and Natural Products and Bioprospecting. Some of Kunming Institute of Botany's most productive authors include Jianchu Xu, De-Zhu Li, Ji‐Kai Liu, Hang Sun, Han‐Dong Sun, Xiao‐Jiang Hao, Kevin D. Hyde, Xiao‐Dong Luo, Ying‐Jun Zhang and Ting‐Shuang Yi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact