Korea Forest Service

59.0k citations
3.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Korea Forest Service

3.3k papers receiving 56.9k citations

Peers

Korea Forest Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 6.4k
  • Plant Science 18.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 9.6k
  • Insect Science 5.1k
  • Biomaterials 5.0k
Replace Shenyang Agricultural University with:
Shenyang Agricultural University China
Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research China
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology South Korea
Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology South Korea
Rural Development Administration South Korea
Institute of Applied Ecology China
Mokpo National University South Korea
Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology China
Institute of Oceanology China
National Institute of Fisheries Science South Korea
Korea Forest Service relative to Shenyang Agricultural University China Shenyang Agricultural University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Shenyang Agricultural University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Korea Forest Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Korea Forest Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Korea Forest Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korea Forest Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Korea Forest Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Korea Forest Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Korea Forest Service at the time of their publication.

About Korea Forest Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Korea Forest Service have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 59.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 847 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.6k papers in Plant Science, 417 papers in Insect Science, 389 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 335 papers in Cell Biology on the topics of Ecology and Conservation Studies (508 papers), Plant and animal studies (422 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (319 papers), Forest ecology and management (206 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (174 papers), Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science (173 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (172 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (162 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (6.4k citations), Plant Science (18.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (9.6k citations), Insect Science (5.1k citations) and Biomaterials (5.0k citations). Authors at Korea Forest Service collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and India and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Plant Disease, Plants, BioResources and Scientific Reports. Some of Korea Forest Service's most productive authors include Il‐Kwon Park, Qinglin Wu, Sang‐Chul Shin, Jong‐Hwan Lim, Jaegyoung Gwon, Junheon Kim, Steven W. Running, Andreas Rigling, Zhen Zhang and Edward H. Hogg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact