University of Kent

924.3k citations
33.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Kent

31.4k papers receiving 923k citations

Peers

University of Kent
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Sociology and Political Science 95.6k
  • Strategy and Management 28.4k
  • Social Psychology 28.9k
  • Clinical Psychology 28.5k
  • Ecology 29k
Replace Queen Mary University of London with:
Queen Mary University of London United Kingdom
Royal Holloway University of London United Kingdom
The Open University United Kingdom
University of Sussex United Kingdom
University of Leicester United Kingdom
University of Bath United Kingdom
University of Reading United Kingdom
University of East Anglia United Kingdom
University of Antwerp Belgium
UCLouvain Belgium
University of Kent relative to Queen Mary University of London United Kingdom Queen Mary University of London's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Queen Mary University of London · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Kent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Kent. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Kent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Kent more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Kent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Kent at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Kent at the time of their publication.

About University of Kent

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Kent have published 33.3k papers, which have received a total of 924.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.4k papers in Sociology and Political Science, 1.6k papers in Artificial Intelligence, 1k papers in General Health Professions, 1.6k papers in Political Science and International Relations and 560 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Logic, programming, and type systems (531 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (531 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (390 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (385 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (346 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (340 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (323 papers) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (317 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Sociology and Political Science (95.6k citations), Strategy and Management (28.4k citations), Social Psychology (28.9k citations), Clinical Psychology (28.5k citations) and Ecology (29k citations). Authors at University of Kent collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Electronics Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Molecular Physics and Biochemical Society Transactions. Some of University of Kent's most productive authors include Ian T. Jolliffe, William Dominic Joshua Abrams, Karen M. Douglas, Alex Alves Freitas, Rupert James Brown, Joachim Stoeber, Robert B. Freedman, Jiangzhou Wang, John Mingers and Janet Grace Sayers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact