Center for Security Studies

2.2k citations
293 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Center for Security Studies

232 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Center for Security Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Political Science and International Relations 628
  • Development 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 663
  • Information Systems 249
  • General Energy 11
Replace Rochester Institute of Technology Kosovo with:
Rochester Institute of Technology Kosovo Kosovo
International Consultants (Egypt) Egypt
Italian Resuscitation Council Italy
College of Law and Business Israel
Hungarian Central Statistical Office Hungary
Croatian National Bank Croatia
Beykoz Üniversitesi Türkiye
Bank of Cyprus Oncology Center Cyprus
University of Applied Science Budapest Hungary
State University of Applied Sciences in Jaroslaw Poland
Center for Security Studies relative to Rochester Institute of Technology Kosovo Kosovo Rochester Institute of Technology Kosovo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Rochester Institute of Technology Kosovo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Center for Security Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Security Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Security Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Security Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Security Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Security Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Security Studies at the time of their publication.

About Center for Security Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Security Studies have published 293 papers, which have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in General Energy, 78 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 8 papers in Development, 86 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 31 papers in Information Systems on the topics of Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (29 papers), Information and Cyber Security (20 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (18 papers), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (13 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (13 papers), Global Security and Public Health (12 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (12 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Political Science and International Relations (628 citations), Development (63 citations), Sociology and Political Science (663 citations), Information Systems (249 citations) and General Energy (11 citations). Authors at Center for Security Studies collaborate with scholars in Greece, Switzerland and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Peace Research, Swiss Political Science Review, Middle East Policy, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures and Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. Some of Center for Security Studies's most productive authors include Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Enzo Nussio, A. Eckardt, Allard Duursma, Max Smeets, Van Jackson, Florian J. Egloff, Jonas Hagmann, Alan M. Steinberg and Christina Sotiropoulou.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact