Jönköping University

202.7k citations
7.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Jönköping University

6.3k papers receiving 173.0k citations

Peers

Jönköping University
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 38.8k
  • Business and International Management 8.3k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 27.4k
  • Accounting 17.7k
  • Strategy and Management 21.4k
Replace BI Norwegian Business School with:
BI Norwegian Business School Norway
Hamburg University of Technology Germany
Karlstad University Sweden
University of Agder Norway
Örebro University Sweden
Linnaeus University Sweden
Halmstad University Sweden
University of Stavanger Norway
Tampere University Finland
Mälardalen University Sweden
Jönköping University relative to BI Norwegian Business School Norway BI Norwegian Business School's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
BI Norwegian Business School · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Jönköping University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Jönköping University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Jönköping University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jönköping University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Jönköping University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Jönköping University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Jönköping University at the time of their publication.

About Jönköping University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Jönköping University have published 7.6k papers, which have received a total of 202.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 765 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 520 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 68 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 431 papers in Management Information Systems and 35 papers in Research and Theory on the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (487 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (355 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (226 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (216 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (206 papers), Product Development and Customization (180 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (170 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (167 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (38.8k citations), Business and International Management (8.3k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (27.4k citations), Accounting (17.7k citations) and Strategy and Management (21.4k citations). Authors at Jönköping University collaborate with scholars in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Small Business Economics, European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Disability and Rehabilitation. Some of Jönköping University's most productive authors include Johan Wiklund, Per Davidsson, Friederike Welter, Dean A. Shepherd, Mattias Nordqvist, Helene Ahl, Amir H. Pakpour, Chung-Ying Lin, Mark Damian Griffiths and Лейф Мелин.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact