John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health top 2%
Papers in
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 445
- Child Abuse and Trauma 267
- Health 352
- Top scholars
- Eugene M. IzhikevichCathy Spatz WidomSusan OyamaRobert W. RieberM. N. RosenbluthBernard J. BaarsKevin L. NadalAniruddh D. Patel
- Journals
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (101 papers)Law and Human Behavior (57 papers)Journal of Criminal Justice (54 papers)Nuclear Science and Engineering (44 papers)Dialectical Anthropology (39 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
5.0k papers receiving 138.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
- Clinical Psychology 33.8k
- Health 10.1k
- Social Psychology 21.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 18.0k
- Sociology and Political Science 42.9k
Countries citing scholars working at John Jay College of Criminal Justice
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at John Jay College of Criminal Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Jay College of Criminal Justice more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at John Jay College of Criminal Justice
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with John Jay College of Criminal Justice at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with John Jay College of Criminal Justice at the time of their publication.
About John Jay College of Criminal Justice
In recent decades, authors affiliated with John Jay College of Criminal Justice have published 6.0k papers, which have received a total of 151.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Clinical Psychology, 352 papers in Health, 2.1k papers in Sociology and Political Science, 320 papers in Gender Studies and 659 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (694 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (490 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (445 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (267 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (242 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (238 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (229 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (223 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (33.8k citations), Health (10.1k citations), Social Psychology (21.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (18.0k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (42.9k citations). Authors at John Jay College of Criminal Justice collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Law and Human Behavior, Journal of Criminal Justice, Nuclear Science and Engineering and Dialectical Anthropology. Some of John Jay College of Criminal Justice's most productive authors include Eugene M. Izhikevich, Cathy Spatz Widom, Susan Oyama, Robert W. Rieber, M. N. Rosenbluth, Bernard J. Baars, Kevin L. Nadal, Aniruddh D. Patel, Philip T. Yanos and Ralph J. Greenspan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.