High Magnetic Field Laboratory
Impact in
-
- Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Papers in
-
- Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials 461
- Multiferroics and related materials 126
-
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics 301
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 251
- Top scholars
- Qianwang ChenYuping SunYang YangXuebin ZhuFangcai ZhengWenhai SongW. J. LuGuoliang Xia
- Journals
- Physical review. B. (288 papers)Applied Physics Letters (186 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (106 papers)Journal of Alloys and Compounds (97 papers)Nature Communications (71 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
High Magnetic Field Laboratory
3.4k papers receiving 100.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 16k
- Condensed Matter Physics 9.8k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 10.4k
- Materials Chemistry 24.6k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 15.8k
Countries citing scholars working at High Magnetic Field Laboratory
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at High Magnetic Field Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at High Magnetic Field Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites High Magnetic Field Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at High Magnetic Field Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with High Magnetic Field Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with High Magnetic Field Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About High Magnetic Field Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with High Magnetic Field Laboratory have published 3.6k papers, which have received a total of 101.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 840 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 584 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 690 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 816 papers in Materials Chemistry and 98 papers in Biophysics on the topics of Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (461 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (306 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (301 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (296 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (264 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (251 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (142 papers) and Multiferroics and related materials (126 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (16k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (9.8k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (10.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (24.6k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (15.8k citations). Authors at High Magnetic Field Laboratory collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. B., Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Alloys and Compounds and Nature Communications. Some of High Magnetic Field Laboratory's most productive authors include Qianwang Chen, Yuping Sun, Yang Yang, Xuebin Zhu, Fangcai Zheng, Wenhai Song, W. J. Lu, Guoliang Xia, Jianming Dai and Lin Hu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.