James Graham Brown Foundation

77.2k citations
1.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

James Graham Brown Foundation

1.5k papers receiving 67.7k citations

Peers

James Graham Brown Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Cancer Research 11.7k
  • Oncology 13.9k
  • Immunology 11.1k
  • Molecular Biology 35.9k
  • Genetics 3.5k
Replace Markey Cancer Center with:
Markey Cancer Center United States
U-M Rogel Cancer Center United States
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center United States
Winship Cancer Institute United States
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
Society of Surgical Oncology United States
Piedmont Cancer Institute United States
Michigan Center for Translational Pathology United States
Magee-Womens Research Institute United States
Institute for Medical Research United States
James Graham Brown Foundation relative to Markey Cancer Center United States Markey Cancer Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Markey Cancer Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at James Graham Brown Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at James Graham Brown Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at James Graham Brown Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Graham Brown Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at James Graham Brown Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with James Graham Brown Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with James Graham Brown Foundation at the time of their publication.

About James Graham Brown Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with James Graham Brown Foundation have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 77.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 366 papers in Oncology, 185 papers in Cancer Research, 127 papers in Hematology, 235 papers in Immunology and 96 papers in Genetics on the topics of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (79 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (71 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (69 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (66 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (62 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (58 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (54 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (54 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (11.7k citations), Oncology (13.9k citations), Immunology (11.1k citations), Molecular Biology (35.9k citations) and Genetics (3.5k citations). Authors at James Graham Brown Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, Poland and India and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, The Journal of Immunology, Leukemia and Journal of Biological Chemistry. Some of James Graham Brown Foundation's most productive authors include Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, Jonathan B. Chaires, Janina Ratajczak, Magda Kucia, Ramesh C. Gupta, Farrukh Aqil, John W. Eaton, John O. Trent, Radha Munagala and Jeyaprakash Jeyabalan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact