Vale Technological Institute

17.5k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Vale Technological Institute

1.1k papers receiving 16.7k citations

Peers

Vale Technological Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 745
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 832
  • Pollution 1.3k
Replace Amazon Research Foundation with:
Amazon Research Foundation Brazil
University of French Guiana French Guiana
Ecologie des Forêts de Guyane French Guiana
Universidade da Amazônia Brazil
Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources Brazil
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade Brazil
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá Brazil
Universidade Federal de Jataí Brazil
Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia Brazil
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso Brazil
Vale Technological Institute relative to Amazon Research Foundation Brazil Amazon Research Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Amazon Research Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Vale Technological Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Vale Technological Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Vale Technological Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vale Technological Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Vale Technological Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Vale Technological Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Vale Technological Institute at the time of their publication.

About Vale Technological Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Vale Technological Institute have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 17.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 349 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 67 papers in Ecological Modeling, 12 papers in Horticulture, 145 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 53 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology on the topics of Plant and animal studies (222 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (132 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (98 papers), Heavy metals in environment (73 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (67 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (64 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (58 papers) and Mineral Processing and Grinding (54 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (745 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (832 citations) and Pollution (1.3k citations). Authors at Vale Technological Institute collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Rodriguésia, PLoS ONE, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Wear and Scientific Reports. Some of Vale Technological Institute's most productive authors include José Oswaldo Siqueira, Markus Gastauer, Pedro Walfir Martins e Souza Filho, Tereza Cristina Giannini, Roberto Dall’Agnol, Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca, Guilherme Oliveira, Prafulla Kumar Sahoo, Sílvio Júnio Ramos and Amilton Sinátora.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact