Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
Impact in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
Papers in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 52
-
- Web Data Mining and Analysis 48
- Top scholars
- Zhou PingLoet LeydesdorffShuo XuDino PedreschiFosca GiannottiMirco NanniFabio PinelliJunsheng Zhang
- Journals
- Scientometrics (40 papers)Journal of Informetrics (11 papers)IEEE Access (10 papers)Information Sciences (8 papers)The Electronic Library (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
763 papers receiving 11.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.1k
- Modeling and Simulation 473
- Transportation 650
- Signal Processing 1.0k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 618
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China have published 941 papers, which have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 55 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 175 papers in Information Systems, 251 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 29 papers in Modeling and Simulation and 47 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation on the topics of Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (66 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (63 papers), Topic Modeling (52 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (52 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (48 papers), Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications (39 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (38 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.1k citations), Modeling and Simulation (473 citations), Transportation (650 citations), Signal Processing (1.0k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (618 citations). Authors at Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China collaborate with scholars in China, Italy and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, IEEE Access, Information Sciences and The Electronic Library. Some of Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China's most productive authors include Zhou Ping, Loet Leydesdorff, Shuo Xu, Dino Pedreschi, Fosca Giannotti, Mirco Nanni, Fabio Pinelli, Junsheng Zhang, Jingyuan Yu and Liming Cai.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.