Institute of Life Sciences

92.1k citations
3.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 75
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 74
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 72
    • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 69

Institute of Life Sciences

2.9k papers receiving 83.4k citations

Peers

Institute of Life Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Molecular Biology 35.9k
  • Molecular Medicine 2.6k
  • Biomaterials 6.9k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 2.1k
  • Biotechnology 3.0k
Replace Indian Institute of Chemical Biology with:
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology India
Institute of Molecular Medicine India
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology India
Central Drug Research Institute India
Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University India
Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology India
Institute of Bioinformatics India
National Centre for Cell Science India
Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences India
Institute of Microbial Technology India
Institute of Life Sciences relative to Indian Institute of Chemical Biology India Indian Institute of Chemical Biology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Life Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Life Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Life Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Life Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Life Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Life Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Life Sciences have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 92.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Molecular Biology, 119 papers in Biotechnology, 64 papers in Molecular Medicine, 262 papers in Immunology and 65 papers in Endocrinology on the topics of Mosquito-borne diseases and control (75 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (75 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (74 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (73 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (72 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (70 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (69 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (69 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (35.9k citations), Molecular Medicine (2.6k citations), Biomaterials (6.9k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (2.1k citations) and Biotechnology (3.0k citations). Authors at Institute of Life Sciences collaborate with scholars in India, Japan and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Biochemistry, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Scientific Reports and RSC Advances. Some of Institute of Life Sciences's most productive authors include Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo, Suphiya Parveen, Amaresh Chandra Panda, Sarbari Acharya, Chandana Mohanty, Ranjita Misra, Manojit Pal, Fahima Dilnawaz, Birendra Prasad Shaw and Aharon Oren.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact