Institute of Religious Studies

9.0k citations
1.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 337
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 179
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 94

Institute of Religious Studies

1.2k papers receiving 7.4k citations

Peers

Institute of Religious Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Religious studies 1.9k
  • Classics 664
  • Archeology 1.7k
  • Anthropology 1.3k
  • Philosophy 1.3k
Replace National University of Tres de Febrero with:
National University of Tres de Febrero Argentina
Secretaria da Educação Brazil
Associação Saúde da Família Brazil
Secretaria Municipal de Educação de São Paulo Brazil
Alberto Hurtado University Chile
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia Brazil
Secretaria de Estado de Educação do Distrito Federal Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas Brazil
Metropolitan University of Educational Sciences Chile
Universidad Nacional de San Martín Peru
Institute of Religious Studies relative to National University of Tres de Febrero Argentina National University of Tres de Febrero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×100×200×332×
National University of Tres de Febrero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Religious Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Religious Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Religious Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Religious Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Religious Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Religious Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Religious Studies at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Religious Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Religious Studies have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 442 papers in Religious studies, 294 papers in Archeology, 87 papers in Classics, 229 papers in Philosophy and 166 papers in History on the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (337 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (179 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (130 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (104 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (94 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (77 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (75 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (69 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Religious studies (1.9k citations), Classics (664 citations), Archeology (1.7k citations), Anthropology (1.3k citations) and Philosophy (1.3k citations). Authors at Institute of Religious Studies collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal for the Study of Judaism, Bijdragen, Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, Israel Affairs and Numen. Some of Institute of Religious Studies's most productive authors include Jan Nicolaas Bremmer, Robert Anthony Orsi, Richard Kieckhefer, John Swinton, Marjo W. Buitelaar, Joan E. Taylor, Madawi Al‐Rasheed, Robert Alan Segal, Carool Kersten and Arie L. Molendijk.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact