Institute for Social and Economic Research
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Health disparities and outcomes
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 139
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 131
- Gender Studies 199
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 167
- Top scholars
- Stephen P. JenkinsAmanda SackerDuncan J. WattsDavid J. PevalinMark L. BryanYvonne KellyMatthew SalganikPeter Sheridan Dodds
- Journals
- Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (25 papers)Social Science & Medicine (17 papers)Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (14 papers)Fiscal Studies (14 papers)Social Indicators Research (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Institute for Social and Economic Research
1.4k papers receiving 28.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Health 3.0k
- Gender Studies 3.0k
- Economics and Econometrics 7.4k
- Sociology and Political Science 10.4k
- Demography 2.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Social and Economic Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Social and Economic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Social and Economic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Social and Economic Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Social and Economic Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Social and Economic Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Social and Economic Research at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Social and Economic Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Social and Economic Research have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 34.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 633 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 199 papers in Gender Studies, 121 papers in Health, 121 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 22 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (167 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (139 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (131 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (125 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (111 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (104 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (78 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (3.0k citations), Gender Studies (3.0k citations), Economics and Econometrics (7.4k citations), Sociology and Political Science (10.4k citations) and Demography (2.5k citations). Authors at Institute for Social and Economic Research collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Social Science & Medicine, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Fiscal Studies and Social Indicators Research. Some of Institute for Social and Economic Research's most productive authors include Stephen P. Jenkins, Amanda Sacker, Duncan J. Watts, David J. Pevalin, Mark L. Bryan, Yvonne Kelly, Matthew Salganik, Peter Sheridan Dodds, Meena Kumari and Andreas Peichl.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.