Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory
Impact in
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
-
- Chaos control and synchronization
Papers in
-
- GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials 138
-
- Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation 55
- Metal and Thin Film Mechanics 52
- Top scholars
- David CitrinLaurent CapolungoAlexandre LocquetLaurent LargerBadreddine M. AssouarNico DeclercqMourad OudichMatthieu R. Bloch
- Journals
- Applied Physics Letters (37 papers)Journal of Crystal Growth (24 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (20 papers)Optics Letters (19 papers)Acta Materialia (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory
763 papers receiving 17.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
- Condensed Matter Physics 1.9k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.7k
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering 60
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.7k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 6.0k
Countries citing scholars working at Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory have published 811 papers, which have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 144 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 162 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 5 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 163 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 289 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (138 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (78 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (61 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (55 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (52 papers), Terahertz technology and applications (52 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (51 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (44 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (1.9k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.7k citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (60 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.7k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (6.0k citations). Authors at Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory collaborate with scholars in France, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Crystal Growth, Journal of Applied Physics, Optics Letters and Acta Materialia. Some of Georgia Tech-CNRS Laboratory's most productive authors include David Citrin, Laurent Capolungo, Alexandre Locquet, Laurent Larger, Badreddine M. Assouar, Nico Declercq, Mourad Oudich, Matthieu R. Bloch, Jean-Pierre Goedgebuer and Paul L. Voss.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.