Institute for Plasma Research
Impact in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 967
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 262
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 519
- Top scholars
- Abhijit SenP. K. KawPredhiman KawGeorge L. JohnstonAmita DasParitosh ChaudhuriS. MukherjeeK. Avinash
- Journals
- Physics of Plasmas (443 papers)Fusion Engineering and Design (326 papers)Nuclear Fusion (105 papers)Review of Scientific Instruments (104 papers)IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (86 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Institute for Plasma Research
3.0k papers receiving 35.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 9.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 7.7k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 8.8k
- Mechanics of Materials 5.1k
- Geophysics 2.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Plasma Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Plasma Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Plasma Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Plasma Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Plasma Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Plasma Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Plasma Research at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Plasma Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Plasma Research have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 35.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.1k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 566 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 794 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 780 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 786 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (967 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (519 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (478 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (475 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (382 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (382 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (363 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (262 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (9.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (7.7k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (8.8k citations), Mechanics of Materials (5.1k citations) and Geophysics (2.7k citations). Authors at Institute for Plasma Research collaborate with scholars in India, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Physics of Plasmas, Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments and IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. Some of Institute for Plasma Research's most productive authors include Abhijit Sen, P. K. Kaw, Predhiman Kaw, George L. Johnston, Amita Das, Paritosh Chaudhuri, S. Mukherjee, K. Avinash, Mukesh Ranjan and G. Sethia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.