Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
About
In The Last Decade
Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3.6k papers receiving 45.7k citations
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.