Institute of Neurobiology

241.2k citations
4.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Neurobiology

3.8k papers receiving 222.2k citations

Peers

Institute of Neurobiology
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 78.1k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 15.6k
  • Neurology 23.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 52.3k
  • Biological Psychiatry 4.2k
Replace HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine with:
HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine Hungary
National Institute of Child Health Hungary
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Italy
Fondazione Santa Lucia Italy
Institute of Neurological Sciences Italy
San Raffaele University of Rome Italy
Maj Institute of Pharmacology Poland
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology Czechia
Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego Poland
National Institute of Mental Health Czechia
Institute of Neurobiology relative to HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine Hungary HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Neurobiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Neurobiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Neurobiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Neurobiology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Neurobiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Neurobiology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Neurobiology at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Neurobiology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Neurobiology have published 4.2k papers, which have received a total of 241.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 263 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 246 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, 725 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 295 papers in Neurology on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (742 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (273 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (217 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (210 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (177 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (173 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (159 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (154 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (78.1k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (15.6k citations), Neurology (23.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (52.3k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (4.2k citations). Authors at Institute of Neurobiology collaborate with scholars in Bulgaria, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neurophysiology. Some of Institute of Neurobiology's most productive authors include Marcus E. Raichle, Uwe Frey, Michael V. Sofroniew, Abraham Z. Snyder, Mark A. Mintun, Alcino J. Silva, Richard Morris, John Cavanagh, David Ferster and Michael N. Shadlen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact