Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery

43.5k citations
2.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery

2.3k papers receiving 42.8k citations

Peers

Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Mechanics of Materials 11.4k
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 9.2k
  • Computational Mechanics 6.5k
  • Mechanical Engineering 10.7k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 11.6k
Replace Technical University of Liberec with:
Technical University of Liberec Czechia
Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Germany
Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science Poland
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Thermomechanics Czechia
Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems Germany
Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology Germany
Danish Technological Institute Denmark
Institute for Energy Technology Norway
Technology Centre Prague Czechia
Sandvik (Sweden) Sweden
Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery relative to Technical University of Liberec Czechia Technical University of Liberec's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Technical University of Liberec · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery have published 2.5k papers, which have received a total of 43.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 679 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 508 papers in Computational Mechanics, 780 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 437 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 331 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (283 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (280 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (151 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (137 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (135 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (121 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (104 papers) and Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (104 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Mechanics of Materials (11.4k citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (9.2k citations), Computational Mechanics (6.5k citations), Mechanical Engineering (10.7k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (11.6k citations). Authors at Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery collaborate with scholars in Poland, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Materials, Journal of Electrostatics, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Energy and Wear. Some of Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery's most productive authors include Wiesław Ostachowicz, A. Jaworek, Marek Krawczuk, A. Krupa, Wojciech Pietraszkiewicz, J. Mizeraczyk, A. Krella, A.T. Sobczyk, Paweł Kudela and Maciej Radzieński.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact